Monday, 16 May 2011

COMING SOON!

It's been quite a while since I've put anything new on here so I'm going to do something big. Something so big it will take another few weeks before it's ready. This could easily be the biggest blog I will ever write. I'll be doing a step-by-step tutorial of how to build [from scratch] your very own

IBANEZ TS808 TUBE SCREAMER OVERDRIVE PEDAL





In order to give the detail needed I will be photographing myself as I make it [hence why it'll be a while before it's up]. It wont look like the one seen above, but it'll sound almost identical - allowing you to get the dry, overdriven Hendrix/SRV/Mayer sound that everybody loves. I might even add a few extras in for kicks.

WATCH THIS SPACE

Monday, 14 March 2011

Is their new ANGLE a STROKE of genius?

The short answer is no. Anyone who has ever been drven anywhere by me or spent pretty much any amount of time with me knows that The Strokes are my favourite band. Upon hearing their new album I am bitterly disappointed.

In 2001 they released their debut album ‘Is This It’ to great critical and public acclaim, and reached number 2 in the UK album chart. Two years later they released ‘Room On Fire’, which received very similar acclaim both critically and publicly, and also reached number 2 in the UK album chart. Come 2005 they were releasing their 14 track album ‘First Impressions of Earth’ [compared to Is This It and Room On Fire‘s 11 tracks each]. First Impressions of Earth entered the UK chart at number 1, however did not stay in the chart as long as it’s predecessors. Although it was the only of the 3 to not reach UK platinum status, it was even more popular critically and publicly than their earlier work.

Following their subsequent tour, the band took a hiatus in order for Julian Casablancas and Albert Hammond Jr to pursue solo careers while the others concentrated on side projects with other bands. Both Casablancas’ and Hammond’s solo projects caught my attention. Neither were even close to the success they had seen with The Strokes, but they felt it was the healthiest thing for them both to do at this point in their careers. At this point I would get technical about why I love these five albums so much, but I doubt most people care so I’m just going to say they had a certain style and edge which I felt set them apart from other artists.
Six years in the wake of First Impressions, the new album ‘Angles’ just doesn’t fill either of these categories. There are [as always] exceptions to this rule. Two songs on this album stood out as shimmering beacons of hope amongst the thick, ebon murk of a very different sound – Under Cover of Darkness and Life Is Simple in the Moonlight. The 10-track album [making it the shortest of their albums to date] is littered with songs which sound as thought they had been thrown together in an afternoon just to fill the space.

Often with bands you expect a good first album, a poor second album, followed by a few years of receeding into obscurity before a glorious comeback with an album to rival their first. This is generally because the first album comes from years of the members playing in their bedrooms, perfecting the songs they’ve been writing since they were 12; the second album is the worst because they have a contract with their record company to release X number of albums in Y number of years, which forces them to write songs in ways and environments that may not be natural to them e.g. writing on the road because they need to, rather than one of them coming up with a genuinely good idea; then comes album 3 – the album made following the members going off and getting married, having kids etc and just getting back to a certain level of normality.
With The Strokes this was not the case. They had 3 amazing albums in the space of 5 years, went their separate ways, and then spent 2 years writing an album full of songs which couldn’t hold a candle to the songs which didn’t make the cut for their previous albums.

Verdict – I genuinely feel a little ill.

Saturday, 19 February 2011

How To Step Up Your Game

Every time I tell someone that I’m struggling to find a blog topic, I’m always told I should write about running. For those of you who didn’t know, I’m running the London Marathon on 17th April. I thought I knew enough about running to perform at my best, and was happy with how my training was going. Then I found this video and realised that I [and most other people] actually know very little about the best way to run to peak ability and avoid injury. Christopher McDougall has some very interesting advice about running, as well as innovative ideas with regards to humanity's history and how we used running on a daily basis.



Having watched this video, I decided to do a little research of my own. First I looked up the Tarahumara and found that they run on the balls of their feet - a technique known as 'toe-striking'. Then I looked up the current marathon world record holder, Haile Gebrselassie [don’t worry, I can’t pronounce it either]. I decided to watch videos of him on a treadmill to see if Mr McDougall was right in his theory of toe-striking rather than heel-striking, and he was. You can tell the difference by how little he tilts his foot back. It’s hard to get this video to pause just before his foot hits the floor so I’ve taken a screen shot as well to show you.t





An example of heel-striking



Since stumbling upon these revelations, I’ve run twice utilising this new information and have found that toe-striking actually helps maintian a consistant speed and stops your legs hurting as much, especially on inclines. As such, I would strongly suggest at least trying toe-striking next time you go for a jog and just see if it works for you.

Until next time, take care and be excellent to each other.
Fred out. 

Sunday, 6 February 2011

'Strange' Things A-Foot

I’ve been struggling for a week or so to find something worth writing a new post about and I think I’ve found a good one. Quite simply, I’m going to nerd out at you all with regards to the speculation and rumours surrounding the next in the Batman series: ‘The Dark Knight Rises’

When Batman Begins was first announced there was a lot of concern that the rebooted franchise would be just as bad a Joel Schumacher’s previous atrocities. One of the most significant downfalls in the fore-mentioned series was the introduction of Robin – Batman’s ‘boy wonder’ side-kick, and so when Christopher Nolan and Christian Bale were asked to sign on to the new project as director and lead role respectively, they both had it written into their contracts that they would not partake in any film which featured Robin. As the most recent series was aimed at a more mature audience, making it far grittier and more realistic than previous depictions, fans saw this character exclusion as a big positive. However, there is now a large amount of hubbub with regards to Nolan announcing that Joseph Gordon-Levitt has signed on as a currently unannounced character. People immediately jumped to the conclusion that he would either be playing The Riddler or Robin The Boy Wonder. Critics then expressed concern that the latter seemed far liklier as Nolan was already tackling 2 new villains: Tom Hardy as Bane and Anne Hathaway as Catwoman. On top of this, there are now rumours going around of Robin Williams playing Hugo Strange [even though he had been considered for the role of The Riddler twice before].

I, however, think there could easily be a much more interesting explanation for this [and you probably already know that when I say ‘interesting’ I mean ‘diving to whole new realms of nerdiness’].

Tim Drake as Red Robin
Dick Grayson as Nightwing
I should begin with a bit of background on some of the characters in question. We’ll start with Robin. Robin is most commonly thought of as being Dick Grayson – the acrobatic son of circus trapeze artists who are killed by gangsters attempting to extort the circus owner. But what a lot of people don’t know is that there were actually 5 different Robins over the years, the fourth of whom was even a girl! Grayson was merely the first. Grayson eventually grew up [as you would expect someone to do] and became a superhero in his own right: Nightwing. Nightwing is, in essence, Batman with a cape-less costume. The third Robin [Tim Drake] followed a very similar path – having grown up and been trained by Batman to the peak of physical and mental ability, he became a new superhero called Red Robin, whose costume and crime-fighting style was even closer to that of Batman than Nightwing. Either of these could be possibilities for Gordon-Levitt’s currently undisclosed character. Another possibility [which I personally think would make for a much better film] is the second incarnation of Robin – Jason Todd. Todd, as Robin, was thought to have met an untimely end at the hands of The Joker in an explosion. However, later in the series an anti-hero turns up in black clothing with a plain red mask, killing any criminal to cross his path, and proving a notable match/equal to Batman in hand-to-hand combat, acrobatics and free-running, before questioning The Dark Knight’s morals concerning criminals and his refusal to kill anyone. It is later exposed that this new anti-hero is, in fact, Jason Todd under the guise of his new alter-ego ‘The Red Hood’ having just barely escaping the explosion that was meant to kill him. Hell-bent on revenge against The Joker for trying to kill him, he also comes baring a mild vendetta against Batman for not killing The Joker himself, having witnessed what he assumed to be his close friend and mentee killed by the villain.

Jason Todd as The Red Hood
I think considering the amount of distruction The Joker causes in ‘The Dark Knight’, The Red Hood could well be a potential new character and could add some quite interesting depth to this more emotionally-charged series.

With regards to Robin Williams, I think Hugo Strange would be a solid piece of casting should they choose to include the character. I do, however think that they may be trying to juggle too many new characters at once. I thnk if they do decide to include Strange, they will need to either make Gordon-Levitt a less violent Red Hood, or Nightwing/Red Robin. Another possibility for Williams would be the villain Hush. Hush was originally Thomas Elliot - a close friend of Bruce Wayne as they were growing up. Wayne and Elliot would play board games together, where Elliot would teach Wayne how to think like his opponent and use their abilities agianst them – a trait which Wayne would later use as a notable characteristic to his vigilante alias. However, although Elliot also came from a financially privilaged background, he despised his parents. His father was an abusive drunk and his mother was frail and accepting of her husband’s behaviour. Elliot hated his parents so intensely that he cut the brakes on their car, causing it to crash. Although his father died, his mother was saved in an emergency operation by Dr Thomas Wayne [Bruce’s father]. This led him to hate Bruce as much as his mother and he relished the irony following the murder of the Waynes. After attacking another child while he was at a summer camp, Elliot was committed to a psychiatric ward, from which he was released by Jonathan Crane [who later became Scarecrow]. Elliot later killed his mother in order to inherit the family fortune and went on to become a successful surgeon. As well as this, he became a successful mob boss [under the mantle of Hush]. Early on in his criminal career, Hush is approached by The Riddler, claiming to know Batman’s true identity. At this point Hush and The Riddler joined forces. He also later joined forces with Jason Todd. Hush is renowned as being ruthless to the extent that he even managed to drive The Joker out of Gotham in fear. The possibility of a Hush-Red Hood collaboration is [in my opinion] a solid idea, if not a bit lengthy to include history and motive for each character, but not impossible to pull off.

Thomas Elliot as Hush
Catwoman’s appearance, for me, would be best-served as a love interest, far less aggressive villain and/or an ally to Batman.

The concept of including Bane in a series of what are supposed to be the most down-to-earth superhero films to date baffles me, to be honest. On top of including a 7ft, mexican, super-intelligent, chemically-fuled muscular brute, they’ve decided to cast Tom Hardy as said monster. And yes, Bane was originally super-intellignet. In fact he was actually depicted as being smarter than Batman in almost every way, however somewhere along the line his characterisation as a genius has been twisted to better suit the stereotype of huge muscley people as being brainless. Don’t get me wrong, I think Hardy is a quality actor, having seen him in Bronson, Inception and Layer Cake…but the fact of the matter is that he’s only 5ft9, compared to Christian Bale’s 6ft2. The only way I can see them making good use of him is to have him as his super-intelligent self and just be extremely muscular for his size.

Bane is infamous as being ‘The Man Who Broke The Bat’ – a title given to him after one of his earliest appearances where he famously breaks Batman’s back. This could be a strong plot point and could validate their choice for Bane’s inclusion. An out-of-action Batman for a small segment of the film could also make way for Nightwing/Red Robin to make a first appearance, taking up Wayne’s mantle while he recovers.

I feel that after 1,308 words and 2 ½ pages of a word document that I should probably wrap this up. If you’ve managed to make it all the way through my nerdy ramblings in one sitting, then congratulations. If you’ve had to tackle it in more than one sitting, then I still appreciate the commitment. I hope that some/any of what I’ve just blabbed about actually happens and if they do, you can be sure that I will publicly cream my pants. In conclusion, I definitely see this as a film to keep an eye on for developments, but being such a big fan of the previous films I must say I’m woried.

Peace out, and until next time be excellent to each other.

Sunday, 23 January 2011

Elementary, my dear readers.

To me this is somewhat old news, as I found out about this in September last year and read into it in some depth. But to those of you who I haven't already mentioned this to/haven't heard some other way, it may come as a surprise to find out that scientists are actually creating new elements. The most recent one to be fabricated is UNUNSEPTIUM. First reports of it's creation were published on 15th March 2010. With atomic number 117 [meaning there are 117 protons in an atom's nucleus] it is classed as the heaviest of the halogen family. However, it's incredible instability means that it only exists for 0.1-40ms before breaking apart into Roentgenium [111] or Dubnium [105] depending on the atomic mass of Ununseptium. Although it barely exists, the fact that they managed to create it using the method they did, has given them reason to believe that they can create elements with atomic numbers 120, 126, or 184 which may well harness what is known as 'The Stability Island'. This is where the periodic table reaches the other side of the unstable, self-destructive elements, and elements start having a lifetime of years or more. This is a particularly important discovery as elements with atomic numbers 120, 126 or 184 could well be used as a safer, more efficient fuel source than any we have ever seen before. Watch out kiddies - here comes the golden age of science which could throw us forward in ways we can only dream of. Definitely a reason to keep your eyes peeled.


Friday, 21 January 2011

Gary Chang


There are many things in this world that make my metophorical [and occasionally actual] jaw drop, but very rarely is it something of such simplicity as this. Gary Chang is and architect from Hon Kong who has turned his 32 square meter apartment into 24 quite spacious rooms. He has done it in the simplest but, perhaps, least obvious way possible – the rooms can change size and even existance. A simple series of sliding walls allow him to swap which room he’s in, with 24 possible combinations. The Library at Huddersfield Uni [and I’m sure hundreds of others nation and probably worldwide] utilise sliding walls to increse book storage space, but I’d never even thought to use them for something like this. If you ask me, grand designs are looking the wrong way, and should focus more on this sort of thing – turning a small space into the biggest house you can with the money you’ve got. Check this man out:



If you want to find out more about the man himself, and the history of the apartment,  you can follow this link:

Saturday, 15 January 2011

Theo Jansen

I know this video has been around for a number of years, and I saw it when it first came out, but as I've only just set up a blog, I figured now was a good time to write about it. The long and short of it - this man is an engineering genius. He has managed to create a number of what he refers to as 'Kinetic Sculptures' which rely solely on bio-mimicry, wind-power and a profound understanding of some exceptional engineering designs and techniques. At first glance you may think "that's pretty impressive, but couldn't any engineer with enough spare time and the right materials do that?", but as he explains his creations in further and further depth, and demonstrates how he gave his 'animaris' brains which can not only keep track of where they are on the beach, but also stop themselves from walking off the beach or into the see, you begin to recognise just how remarkable this man's brain really is. In Sept 2007 [when this video was first released] these creatures weren't perfect, but were still almost entirely self-sustaining. Imagine how much more advanced and potentially independent they may be now.

http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/theo_jansen_creates_new_creatures.html

Well done, sir. I tip my cap to you.